AI for trust
Reports, questionnaire answers, evidence summaries. CASK (Compliance ASK) drafts them from the records you already have, with a citation on every claim. You edit, then approve.
Trust work spans PDFs, documents, screenshots, and spreadsheets. Bring the relevant records together so an AI policy, privacy review, or security assessment starts with your organization's context.
A scan shows what is configured. An integration may show what happened. Neither proves compliance on its own. The agent matches each record to the question it answers and cites it. Your reviewer decides what the evidence supports.
Bring the work and its supporting records into CASK. Review the draft, check its sources, and approve what is ready to share.
Use cases
Plan the work, do it, check the result, and act on the findings. CASK drafts at every step, and your team edits and approves. Choose a step below to see the task, what CASK produces, and the call a person makes.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Start from your AI inventory and existing policies. CASK drafts a governance plan and lists what it could not find, such as a system with no named owner. Your team settles scope and priorities.
scope and owners for review
objectives & processes
Add the AI inventory, the policies you have, and any business requirements. You get a draft plan and a list of the context CASK could not find. You decide the scope, the owners, and what comes first.
Add the processing records, notices, and data-flow notes from each team. CASK sorts them into an assessment plan, and your privacy lead confirms which systems and requirements are in scope.
Tell CASK which framework you are audited against and add the evidence you have. It drafts a roadmap that shows which controls lack evidence. Your team, or ours, then agrees who closes each gap and by when.
implementation & execution
CASK drafts the policy from your approved requirements and the records of how teams use AI today. A reviewer reads it against real practice and edits anything that describes a process you do not follow.
Add the vendor's documents and your own requirements. CASK proposes risk entries and treatment options, with the source for each. Your team sets the ratings and decides what risk to accept.
Add the tickets, notes, and chat exports. CASK orders them into a timeline and drafts the report around it. The responders who were there correct the timeline and approve the account.
monitor, measure, evaluate
CASK checks each file against the control statement and shows which passages support it and where the gaps are. Your reviewer judges whether the evidence is current, relevant, and sufficient.
CASK drafts the report with each finding next to its source, plus a list of open questions. Practitioners check that each conclusion follows from the evidence and pick the issues that need action.
Add the questionnaire. CASK answers from your records and cites each answer. Questions with no supporting record come back marked Not Provided, so nothing goes out on a guess. Your team approves the final set.
improve & report
CASK builds a short summary of progress, risks, and open actions from the records you supply. Your team checks it and adds the decisions you need leadership to make.
Start from the findings you have already reviewed. CASK drafts an action plan tied to the evidence, and your owners set the priorities, the people responsible, and the dates.
CASK drafts the reply from the records you choose and cites each statement. A reviewer checks the scope, the accuracy, and what the reply discloses before you send it.
One workspace. Reuse supporting records as you move through the work, and check that they are still current. Want this run for you? See services.